Group Relations (BB2.G)

Print 🖨 PDF 📄

Resources: Main Page | Research Methods (A) | Major Theories (B) | Issues and Contemporary Topics (C) | Professional Community (D)

Rack BB2 (Groups & Teams): Group Relations (BB2.G) | Social Identity Theory | Team Roles | Conflict & Other Dysfunctions

Jump to: Importance | Foundational Works | Research Areas | Curated List of Articles | TAOP Resources | References

Group relations research examines how behavior are influenced not only by a person’s own traits but also by their needs or desires to conform to social demands and expectations. It addresses questions about how groups are defined or define themselves, how the welcome or remove members, how they are structured, and how they collectively deal with internal conflict and external threats.

Importance of Group Relations Research in Organization Studies

This page covers some of the origin story about research in meso-level organizational behavior. Group relations, which is an umbrella term we are using to describe formal or informal groups of individuals operating with an organizational setting, emerged from several key intellectual traditions. The Tavistock Institute, founded in 1947, developed groundbreaking insights by combining psychoanalytic theory with systems thinking. We covered some of the work produced by Tavistock including that of one of its founders, Eric Trist, in Episode 34 on the famous study of coal-getting that led to sociotechnical systems theory. There is also Kurt Lewin’s field theory (Episode 55) and group dynamics work at MIT established crucial frameworks for understanding how groups function.

A central contribution was the recognition that organizations operate as complex systems of interconnected groups, rather than just collections of individuals. This seemingly simple insight revolutionized how we understand organizational behavior. When we look at any organizational challenge – whether it’s implementing change, managing conflict, or improving performance – we now know we must consider group-level dynamics, not just individual behaviors.

The concept of the primary task emerged from this tradition. This refers to what a group must do to survive, which often differs from what it says it’s doing. For example, a team might say their task is improving customer service, but their actual primary task might be preserving their own job security. This also led to the exploration of anxiety in groups, such as a study by Isabel Menzies that we covered in Episode 88. Research showed how groups develop defensive routines to manage anxiety, which can either help or hinder their effectiveness. These defenses might include scapegoating, denial, or splitting (dividing the world into “all good” and “all bad”). Understanding these patterns helps leaders work more effectively with group dynamics rather than against them.

The meaning of group boundaries is another important area of study, and refers to both physical (who’s in and who’s out) and psychological boundaries (what topics are discussable, what roles are acceptable). The associated questions become to what extent do the boundaries work to separate one group from another? Are particular boundaries too rigid or too permeable boundaries, thereby creating dysfunctional silos or chaos? Intergroup relations research has explored how groups maintain or span such boundaries such as stereotyping other groups or their members, competing for resources, or managing or exploiting tensions.

Over time, other dynamics around groups emerged as useful areas of study. Authority relations research reveals how groups relate to authority in complex ways, often recreating early family dynamics or societal patterns in organizational settings. Sometimes this might translate into forms of resistance against organizations’ leaders or efforts to change or transform the organization.

Finally, scholars have been interested in how groups form and the subsequent life-cycle. An example is the popular notion of forming, storming, norming, and performing popularized in Tuckman (1965). Are there other ways that groups form, however?

The practical applications of this research are extensive and relevant. Organizations use these insights to design more effective teams (whether that is groups of front-line workers or teams of C-suite or senior leaders), manage and pursue organizational change while overcoming resistance, improving collaboration across and outside the organization, address conflict more productively, and create healthier organizational cultures.

Some Foundational Works on Group Relations in Organization Studies

The key word in the title is “some.” Group relations is a subfield that casts a wide net, and no summary list of foundational works will ever be satisfying to cover this whole area of research. We offer the below in part to present some of the texts that we have covered in our program along with others that are perhaps high on our priority list for the future.

Lewin’s 1947 article “Frontiers in group dynamics: Concept, method and reality in social science; social equilibria and social change,” was the first of two articles published in the newly established journal Human Relations with the Tavistock Institute, and we covered this in Episode 55. He presented a case for treating the social sciences on the same level with the natural sciences, as previously social science was considered neither rigorous nor valid. Using metaphors from physics, Lewin explains social phenomena in tangible, physical terms through constructs such as “force fields.” In doing so, he explained how individuals within a social space interact in ways that could be measured similarly to physical or chemical phenomenon. And he did so using the results of studies on rather ordinary, mundane phenonena such as training on stitching machines and the crossed interactions between a husband and wife.

Wilfred Bion’s Experiences in groups and other papers (1961) is another Tavistock publication seen as foundational. Drawing from his observations of military psychiatric patients during World War II, Bion developed theories about how groups operate on two levels simultaneously: a rational “work group” focused on tasks, and an emotional “basic assumption group” driven by unconscious needs and anxieties. This dual-level understanding helps explain why groups might behave irrationally despite their members’ best intentions.

A.K. Rice’s Learning for Leadership (2013/1965) and The Enterprise and its Environment (1963). These two books built on Bion’s insights while adding crucial ideas about organizational boundaries and authority. Rice showed how groups must manage both their internal dynamics and their relationships with other groups to function effectively. His work at the Tavistock Institute helped establish the group relations conference model that continues to influence organizational development today (including through the A. K. Rice Institute for the Study of Social Systems that is a non-profit organization dedicated to education on group dynamics according to its website).

The work of Elliott Jaques. Elliott Jaques is one author who bridged psychoanalytic insights about groups with practical organizational design. Among his best known works are two books — The Changing culture of a factory (1951) and A general theory of bureaucracy (1980) — that introduced the concept of requisite organization – the idea that organizational structures need to match the complexity of their tasks. The latter contributed to his stratified systems theory that contributed to leadership (Rack BL) and organizational design studies (Rack BD) along with understanding group dynamics through common roles, common frames of reference within organizations, and common skills and competencies required at echelon. Stratified systems theory was explored in Episode 48.

Isabel Menzies Lyth’s “The Functioning of Social Systems as a Defence Against Anxiety” (1960) revealed how organizations develop structural defenses against anxiety that can become dysfunctional over time. Her study of hospitals showed how organizational structures often evolve to protect people from the emotional demands of their work, sometimes at the cost of effectiveness. We covered this paper in Episode 88.

Contemporary Areas of Research

The study of group relations in organizations has evolved to address contemporary challenges and incorporate new theoretical perspectives in several areas.

Impacts of digital transformation. Also see Rack CD. Researchers are examining how virtual and hybrid work arrangements change how groups form bonds, manage boundaries, and handle authority relations. This research explores how traditional group relations concepts apply when people interact primarily through technology. For instance, scholars are finding that virtual teams often struggle with establishing psychological safety and managing anxiety in ways that differ from in-person groups. While technology can facilitate collaboration across distances, it can also introduce challenges related to communication and relationship-building (Willebois, 2023).

There is also the related topic of artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning integration into group settings, a topic that is so broad that it may be deserving of its own page at some point. Nearly every variable in group relations theory is being challenged when looking into groups that have AIs or algorithms as “members.” Researchers are examining how groups adapt and how human groups respond psychologically to increasing automation. For instance, when does a group treat an AI system as part of the team versus as a tool? This includes studying how groups manage anxiety about AI and how traditional concepts like containment and projection work in human-AI interactions.

Group composition and diversity. Another important area involves studying how groups handle increasing diversity and inclusion. Contemporary researchers are integrating intersectional perspectives with traditional group relations theory to understand how different identities and power dynamics affect group functioning. For example, research is providing evidence that diverse teams can lead to more innovative solutions and improved performance, as they bring together varied perspectives and experiences (Tanaka et al., 2022). This body of work examines how unconscious biases may manifest in group settings and how organizations can create more inclusive group environments while managing the anxieties that often arise around diversity initiatives.

Global and cross-cultural group dynamics. This area of research can be seen as an intersection of the above two, plus more. As organizations become more international, researchers are investigating how cultural differences affect group formation, leadership, and conflict resolution. This work is particularly interested in how groups manage the tensions between global integration and local adaptation, especially through social media and global social networks. A specific example is research into the relationships between social media content creators and distributors within trending topic communities, emphasizing the importance of understanding group interactions and the dynamics of information dissemination (e.g., Recalde et al., 2017).

Leadership, power and authority in groups. This area of study has evolved to examine new forms of organizing. Researchers are investigating how traditional hierarchical structures interact with newer, more fluid organizational forms. This includes studying how groups function in platform organizations, temporary project teams, and other emerging organizational structures. This has led to re-examination of traditional leadership paradigms. For example, recent scholarship into transformational leadership has developed stronger linkages with positive group dynamics as leaders who inspire and motivate their teams can enhance collaboration and commitment among group members (Rudd et al., 2020).

Collective trauma and resilience. This is an area of increased interest since the COVID-19 pandemic (also see Rack CE). Collective trauma and resilience is the shared experiences of significant negative events felt across group members and the capacity to develop strong group systems of defense against anxiety. This research examines emerging ways that groups respond to today’s crises, whether environmental, social, or economic, and how they develop capabilities for collective recovery and adaptation.

Conflict and resolution. The examination of conflict, its negotiation within groups, and ultimate resolution remains an active area of interest. Understanding how groups navigate conflicts and reach consensus helps enable effective collaboration. Constructive conflict, for example, is a framework where differences of perspectives can be presented, discussed, and used to enable better decision-making and innovation, provided that groups have the necessary skills and frameworks to manage disagreements effectively (Mogahed et al., 2020). This area of study has practical implications for organizations needed effective conflict resolution strategies that promote healthy group interactions and enhance overall group performance.

Curated List of Articles from the Management Learning Journal

This is a curated list of resources originated provided by the Management Learning Journal for the TAOP website. Many thanks to Jarryd Daymond and Cara Reed for assembling this.

Mowles, C. (2017) ‘Experiencing uncertainty: On the potential of groups and a group analytic approach for making management education more critical’, Management Learning, 48(5), pp. 505–519. doi: 10.1177/1350507617697868.

This article points to the potential of methods derived from group analytic practice for making management education more critical. It draws on the experience of running a professional doctorate for more experienced managers in a university in the United Kingdom over a 16-year period. Group analysis is informed by the highly social theories of S.H. Foulkes and draws heavily on psychoanalytic theory as well as sociology. First and foremost, though, it places our interdependence at the heart of the process of inquiry and suggests that the most potent place for learning about groups, where we spend most of our lives, is in a group. The article prioritises three areas of management practice for which group analytic methods, as adapted for research environment, are most helpful: coping with uncertainty and the feelings of anxiety which this often arouses; thinking about leadership as a relational and negotiated activity, and encouraging reflexivity in managers. The article also points to some of the differences between the idea of the learning community and psychodynamic perspectives more generally and the limitations of group analytic methods in particular, which may pathologise resistance in the workplace.

Gray, D. E. and Gabriel, Y. (2018) ‘A community of practice or a working psychological group? Group dynamics in core and peripheral community participation’, Management Learning, 49(4), pp. 395–412. doi: 10.1177/1350507618761774.

The concept of communities of practice has become increasingly influential in management literature. Yet, many scholars regard the term as too homogeneous and lacking in empirical support. Our study explores the Silver Academy, a project involving over 100 unemployed and self-employed managers over the age of 50, who came together with the purpose of sharing knowledge and experience in starting up their own businesses. The study shows how the Academy matches the notion of community of practice, including mutual relationships, shared engagement and a common consensus of membership. However, applying Bion’s theory of groups, we challenge the homogeneous and consensual notion of a community of practice, illustrating how, through unconscious group processes, some group members exhibit work-group mentality and the capacity for realistic hard work (and leadership), while others are caught in a basic-assumption mentality, prone to feelings of anxiety, guilt and depression. This is particularly so for a group that has gone through the recent trauma of unemployment.

Mughal, F., Gatrell, C. and Stead, V. (2018) ‘Cultural politics and the role of the action learning facilitator: Analysing the negotiation of critical action learning in the Pakistani MBA through a Bourdieusian lens’, Management Learning, 49(1), pp. 69–85. doi: 10.1177/1350507617740273.

This empirical study contributes to critical action learning research by theorizing the role of an action learning facilitator from a cultural perspective. Our article adds to critical action learning by conceptualizing the dynamics of facilitation in managing interpersonal politics within action learning sets. Employing Bourdieu’s notion of habitus as a theoretical lens, we explore both participant and facilitator accounts of action learning at three Pakistani business schools, shedding light on the culturally influenced social practices that shape their learning interactions. Through a critical interpretation of our data, we illuminate the challenges of facilitation by revealing how deeply ingrained power relations, within the context of gender and asymmetric relationships, influence participants’ ability to organize reflection. We contribute to critical action learning by theorizing the critical role of facilitator mediation in managing interpersonal and intra-group relations within the Pakistani MBA context, outlining the implications for the dynamics and facilitation of action learning.

Means, A. and Mackenzie Davey, K. (2022) ‘‘Maybe it’s culture and maybe it isn’t’: An ethnographic study of sensemaking, culture and performance in a multicultural team’, Management Learning. doi: 10.1177/13505076211070358.

Links between cultural diversity and team performance remain unclear despite extensive research. This study critiques essentialist ‘Input-Process-Output’ logics to focus on team members’ sensemaking. Using observation and interview data from an ethnographic study of an Indian-German team over an 18-month high-pressure project, we used thematic analysis and event sequencing to map sensemaking of culture and performance over time. Team members initially constructed a prospective frame linking stereotypes of cultural difference to performance, which plausibly explained problems while protecting identity. This frame proved resistant to updating. While overt conflict was avoided, the failure to confront difficulties closed down alternative explanations and prevented innovation and learning. Team performance was evaluated both positively and negatively reflecting ongoing ambiguity around performance. The role of culture in performance was only challenged post-project after time for reflection. The longitudinal, ethnographic approach enables this research to contribute to sensemaking by demonstrating the importance of prospective framing and highlighting the role of identity and plausibility in resisting updating frames. We argue that essentialist conceptions of the unequivocal positive or negative outcome of cultural diversity as ‘double-edged sword’ should be reframed to stress agency and the importance of facilitating conditions for learning in multicultural teams.

Jones, O. and Giordano, B. (2021) ‘Family entrepreneurial teams: The role of learning in business model evolution’, Management Learning, 52(3), pp. 267–293. doi: 10.1177/1350507620934092.

There is limited research linking entrepreneurial learning and business models in start-up businesses. Business models are important cognitive devices that link entrepreneurial thinking and engagement with customers and suppliers during business start-up. This research examines business model evolution during the first 6 years of a family-based start-up, which was formed in 2008 by 2 young brothers. The business grew quickly and achieved a turnover of £4.5 million with 15 staff members by 2014. The case study contributes a better understanding of ways in which team-based learning in a family business links experiential and cognitive learning during business model evolution.

Related Episodes from the Talking About Organizations Podcast

112: Hierarchies & Promotion – The “Peter Principle”

The diligent administrative assistant moves up to supervisor but fails. The assembly line worker is promoted to foreman but cannot do the job. A teacher earns a deputy principal position in a school but falls flat on their face. Why is that? Why does this seem to happen across organizations? In The Peter Principle, Lawrence J. Peter and Raymond Hull not only provides answers to these questions, they delve into all the possible implications. The Principle goes like this, “In a hierarchy, everyone rises to their level of incompetence.” How they derived this principle the subject of our conversation that …

94: Situated Learning – Lave & Wenger

This month, we discuss Jean Lave & Etienne Wenger’s Situated Learning: Legitimate Peripheral Participation, published in 1991. This short but powerful book presents a new way of thinking about adult learning as a social activity in which experienced members of a group or community of practice share their knowledge with new members to perpetuate the group identity. They present five case studies – one by Lave herself with four from other researchers – to help broaden the perspective of how situated learning works social involvement in which newer members are initiated through the exercise of low-risk or controlled tasks …

89: Administrative Behavior in Public Sector — Herbert Kaufman

This month’s episode examines a classic study in public administration, Herbert Kaufman’s “The Forest Ranger: A Study in Administrative Behavior,” published in 1960. The U.S. Forest Service was a widely distributed organization with its many Rangers individually assigned to manage large tracts of public land. It would have been easy for the Forest Service to lose control and fragment, but it did not. Kaufman’s study showed how and why the various techniques used by the Forest Service kept the Rangers integrated under a common vision …

88: Social Defenses Against Anxiety — Isabel Menzies

This month’s episode examines one of the classic studies from the Tavistock Institute, Isabel Menzies’ “A Case-Study in the Functioning of Social Systems as a Defence Against Anxiety.” This famous study of how a teaching hospital developed odd and somewhat dysfunctional methods for protecting its nurses from anxiety and stress by effectively isolating nurses from the patients to prevent emotional attachment. Nursing students witnessing these methods in practice found them in violation of their expectations regarding care and their professional calling, and were quitting. What were these methods and why did they come about? …

68: Globalization and Culture Clashes — “American Factory” (Documentary)

For this episode, we cover a documentary that presents a compelling picture about culture clashes in the workplace. American Factory is an important and powerful documentary, telling the story of cultural clashes and labor-management relations as a Chinese firm re-opened and re-purposed a close automotive plant in Ohio …

55: Group Dynamics and Foundations of Organizational Change – Kurt Lewin

We discuss Kurt Lewin’s article, “Frontiers in Group Dynamics,” that makes a strong case for treating the social sciences on the same level with the natural sciences–previously, social science was considered neither rigorous nor valid. Using metaphors from physics, Lewin explains social phenomena in tangible, physical terms and explains how individuals within a social space interact in ways that could be measured similarly to physical or chemical phenomenon …

53: Taylorism in Motion — Charlie Chaplin’s Modern Times

We discuss Charlie Chaplin’s 1936 film “Modern Times” balances great physical comedy with powerful social commentary. Chaplin portrayed a hapless Worker on an assembly line who is tormented both by supervisors and the work itself. After being subjected to a humiliating experiment intended to improve the line’s efficiency, the Worker runs through a series of rotating jobs, stints in jail, and other misadventures as he tries to find his purpose in life …

45: Fate of Whistleblowers – C. Fred Alford

We discuss Fred Alford’s book Whistleblowers: Broken Lives and Organizational Power in 2001 to understand and make sense of horrible treatment often suffered by those who witness and report illegal or immoral acts and have the courage and persistence to speak up and stand for what is right. In workplace environments, we have a name for such heroic men and women – whistleblowers. But historically, the experiences of many other whistleblowers are discouraging – being ostracized, ignored, harassed, marginalized, physically attacked, socially isolated and ultimately defeated while the wrongdoers continue with their organizations. Alford’s study brings these experiences to light …

35: The Managed Heart – Arlie Hochschild

The Managed Heart, originally published in 1983 by Dr. Arlie Hochschild, introduced the concept of emotional labour as a counterpart to the physical and mental labour performed in the scope of one’s duties. The importance of emotional labour is made clear in Dr. Hochschild’s descrption of flight attendants, who regardless of the dispositions of airline passengers, turbulence in the flight, or personal stress is required to act and behave in ways that minimize passenger anxiety and encourage them to fly with that airline again. Thus, the book explores the challenges of stress, protecting one’s personal identity and private life, differentiated …

Reflections on Wieliczka

Tom reflects on an experience that arose during his preparations for Episode 34 (Trist & Bamforth, 1951). In this post, he reminisces on a bus tour taken in the summer of 2001 from Heidelberg, Germany to the Wieliczka Salt Mines located only a short drive from Krakow. These mines are famous for the salt sculptures and engravings that the miners carved out of the walls as a means of overcoming the harsh and isolated environment …

32: Organizational Stupidity with Mats Alvesson and Bjorn Erik Mork LIVE

“Functional stupidity” is the term used by Alvesson and Spicer to describe a strange phenomenon they observed in practice: smart people in organizations that do seemingly not smart things because people are discouraged to think and reflect. Mats Alvesson and Bjørn Erik Mørk sit down with Ralph to talk about functional stupidity and real world implications for nearly an hour after Mats’ keynote speech at the conference …

30: Corporate Culturalism — Hugh Willmott

Hugh Willmott Strength is Ignorance; Slavery is Freedom: Managing Culture in Modern Organizations was Hugh Willmott’s critique of corporate culturalism, a dominant theme in management studies in the 1980s. In 1993, when the paper appeared in the Journal of Management Studies, strengthening corporate culture was seen as a way to improve organizational performance. But instead of an academic response, Willmott used George Orwell’s classic dystopian novel Nineteen Eighty-Four to explain his objections …

28: Organizations as Rhetoric — Mats Alvesson

Our next episode in the JMS classics series covers Mats Alvesson’s “, Organizations as Rhetoric: Knowledge-Intensive Firms and the Struggle with Ambiguity” from 1993 that concluded with the idea that organizations are best understood as ‘systems of persuasion’ where actors use their agency to engage in discourse on behalf of the organization …

25: Competitive Groups as Cognitive Communities — Joseph Porac

We discuss another JMS classic, “Competitive Groups as Cognitive Communities the case of Scottish Knitwear Manufacturers” by Porac, Thomas, and Baden-Fuller from 1989. Employing an approach based on the ‘interpretive’ side of organizations, the Authors propose that a key mechanism in competition and strategy is given by the “mental models used by key decision-makers to interpret the task environment of their organization”. These, in turn, emerge out of material and cognitive exchanges among customers, suppliers, and producers …

24: Learning by Knowledge-Intensive Firms — Bill Starbuck

We discuss another of the classics from the Journal of Management Studies, a paper from 1992 by William Starbuck, entitled “Learning by knowledge-intensive firms”. This time, we are very happy to be joined by the author of the work, Professor William Starbuck, one of the leading experts in Organization Theory, whose research covers an incredible number of areas of expertise, as shown in his biography. This paper is the first to discuss knowledge intensive firms, concept based on the economists’ notions of capital and labour intensive firms, and which are defined as those firms where “knowledge has more importance than …

20: High Reliability in Practice – USN Rear Admiral Tom Mercer

Based around a classic work by Weick and Roberts (1993) on Collective Mind in Organizations – where the authors observed and analyzed the way people on the deck of an aircraft carrier function in a collective manner – this episode brings you a discussion of how concepts of High Reliability (see also Episode 11) flesh out in real life! …

10: Twelve Angry Men (1957) – Directed by Sidney Lumet

12 Angry Men, directed by Sidney Lumet, is one of the major milestones of film history. It dates back to 1957 and tells the story of a jury, the twelve angry men of the title, and how they decide on the innocence or guilt of a young boy accused of murder. The entire film takes place in the jury room, with the exception of a few scenes, namely those in the courthouse and in the bathroom. We use this story as a lens to discuss themes in organizational theory such as decision making and consensus building among groups …

4: Carnegie Mellon Series #1 – Organizational Routines

In our first episode on the Carnegie-Mellon School, we examine selected passages from March & Simon’s book Organizations and Cyert & March’s book A Behavioral Theory of the Firm to address the rise of scholarly thought on matters of organizational routines …

Rack BA — Classic Organization and Management Theory

Curated list of resources regarding the major “classical” theories that initiated the field of organization studies, beginning with Taylorism and scientific management and continuing with the theories Fayol, Weber, and others …

Rack BB1 – Organizational Behavior (Micro-Individual)

Curated list of resources regarding the major theories of organization behavior such as emotions, sensemaking, socialization and organizational climate, and many others …

Rack BB2 — Organizational Behavior (Meso-Groups and Teams)

Curated list of resources regarding theories on groups, teams, and other small collections of individuals within an organizational context, from the worker level to top management teams …

Rack BB3 — Organizational Behavior (Macro-Org/System)

Curated list of resources on open systems theory and its many descendents such as general systems theory, cybernetics, and organizational ecology …

Rack BC — Contingency Theory

Curated list of resources regarding the major theories regarding the organizational context and how particular situations influence organizational structures, behaviors, and so on. Includes classic contingency theories and pragmatism …

Rack BD — Organizational Design

Curated list of resources on theories related to organizational structures and design, including control structures, power, and job design …

Rack BG — Organizational Development and Change

Curated list of resources regarding various theories regarding the external environment in organizations, such as labor relations, resource dependence theory, and others …

Rack BH – Human Dimension – Culture, Climate, Identity

Curated list of resources regarding sustainability and corporate social responsibility such as sustainable business practices, responses to climate change, sociomateriality, and ethical considerations …

Rack BI — Institution Theory

Curated list of resources on institution theory as exercised in organization studies …

Rack BL — Leadership Theories

Curated list of resources on theories related to leadership in organizations including classic trait theory, behavioral theories of leadership, and transactional / transformational leadership …

Rack BM – Modern Management Theories

Curated list of resources regarding the major schools of thought and the theoretical perspectives they established. Includes the Carnegie-Mellon School, Aston School, and others …

Rack BQ — Postmodern and Critical Theories

Curated list of resources on postmodernist views of organizations and organizing and contrasting them with the modernist view. Includes critical management studies and complexity theory …

Rack BS — Sociology & Anthropology

Curated list of resources on postmodernist views of organizations and organizing and contrasting them with the modernist view. Includes critical management studies and complexity theory …

References

Anthropic. (2024). What are the major contributions of research into group relations in organizational studies; What are the most important foundational works on group relations from before 1980 in organization studies; What are some important contemporary areas of research into group relations; Can you explain more about the research on artificial intelligence and human-AI interactions in group relations studies. Claude (March 2024 version) [Large Language Model].

Bion, W. R. (1969). Experiences in Groups and Other Papers. London: Tavistock Publications. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203359075

Gray, D. E. and Gabriel, Y. (2018) ‘A community of practice or a working psychological group? Group dynamics in core and peripheral community participation’, Management Learning, 49(4), 395–412. doi: 10.1177/1350507618761774.

Jaques, E. (1951). The changing culture of a factory. Routledge.

Jaques, E. (1980). A general theory of bureaucracy. Heinemann Educational Books.

Jones, O. and Giordano, B. (2021) ‘Family entrepreneurial teams: The role of learning in business model evolution’, Management Learning, 52(3), 267–293. doi: 10.1177/1350507620934092.

Means, A., & Mackenzie Davey, K. (2023). ‘Maybe it’s culture and maybe it isn’t’: An ethnographic study of sensemaking, culture and performance in a multicultural team. Management Learning, 54(2), 223-243.

Menzies, I. E. (1967). The functioning of social systems as a defence against anxiety: a report on a study of the nursing service of a general hospital. Centre for Applied Social Research, Tavistock Institute of Human Relations.

Mogahed, M., Zytoon, A., Essa, B., Abdellatif, W., Ghanem, N., & ElWakeel, B. (2020). Natural history of hepatic hemangiomas as a guide for surgical indication. Egyptian Liver Journal, 10(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s43066-020-00065-5

Mowles, C. (2017) ‘Experiencing uncertainty: On the potential of groups and a group analytic approach for making management education more critical’, Management Learning, 48(5), 505–519. doi: 10.1177/1350507617697868.

Mughal, F., Gatrell, C. and Stead, V. (2018) ‘Cultural politics and the role of the action learning facilitator: Analysing the negotiation of critical action learning in the Pakistani MBA through a Bourdieusian lens’, Management Learning, 49(1), 69–85. doi: 10.1177/1350507617740273.

Recalde, L., Nettleton, D. F., Baeza-Yates, R., & Boratto, L. (2017, July). Detection of trending topic communities: Bridging content creators and distributors. In Proceedings of the 28th ACM Conference on Hypertext and Social Media (pp. 205-213).

Rice, A. K. (1963). The enterprise and its environment: A system theory of management organization. Tavistock Publications.

Rice, A. K. (1965). Learning for leadership: Interpersonal and intergroup relations. Tavistock Publications.

Rudd, K., Johnson, S., Agesa, K., Shackelford, K., Tsoi, D., Kievlan, D., … & Naghavi, M. (2020). Global, regional, and national sepsis incidence and mortality, 1990–2017: Analysis for the global burden of disease study. The Lancet, 395(10219), 200-211. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0140-6736(19)32989-7

Scite. (2024). What are the most important foundational works on group relations from before 1980 in organization studies; What are some important contemporary areas of research into group relations. Scite (April 2024 version) [Large Language Model].

Tanaka, T., Tada, Y., & Suzuki, J. (2022). Reproductive and neurobehavioral effects of maternal exposure to dinotefuran in the f1‐generation mice. Birth Defects Research, 114(19), 1266-1285. https://doi.org/10.1002/bdr2.2080

Tuckman, B. W. (1965). Developmental sequence in small groups. Psychological Bulletin. 63(6), 384–399.

Willebois, E. (2023). The clinical relevance of an inflamed appendix in crohn’s disease. Journal of Crohn S and Colitis, 18(6), 812-817. https://doi.org/10.1093/ecco-jcc/jjad202

The inclusion of external links is for informational purposes only and does not necessarily constitute endorsement by TAOP or any of its members.

Jump to: Importance | Foundational Works | Research Areas | Curated List of Articles | TAOP Resources | References

Rack BB2 (Groups & Teams): Group Relations (BB2.G) | Social Identity Theory | Team Roles | Conflict & Other Dysfunctions

Resources: Main Page | Research Methods (A) | Major Theories (B) | Issues and Contemporary Topics (C) | Professional Community (D)

TAOP Resource Center -- Aisle B (Major Theoretical Perspectives) -- Rack BB2 (Groups & Teams)

Jump to: Importance | Foundational Works | Research Areas | Curated List of Articles | TAOP Resources | References

Importance of Group Relations Research in Organization Studies

Some Foundational Works on Group Relations in Organization Studies

Contemporary Areas of Research

Curated List of Articles from the Management Learning Journal

Mowles, C. (2017) ‘Experiencing uncertainty: On the potential of groups and a group analytic approach for making management education more critical’, Management Learning, 48(5), pp. 505–519. doi: 10.1177/1350507617697868.

Gray, D. E. and Gabriel, Y. (2018) ‘A community of practice or a working psychological group? Group dynamics in core and peripheral community participation’, Management Learning, 49(4), pp. 395–412. doi: 10.1177/1350507618761774.

Mughal, F., Gatrell, C. and Stead, V. (2018) ‘Cultural politics and the role of the action learning facilitator: Analysing the negotiation of critical action learning in the Pakistani MBA through a Bourdieusian lens’, Management Learning, 49(1), pp. 69–85. doi: 10.1177/1350507617740273.

Means, A. and Mackenzie Davey, K. (2022) ‘‘Maybe it’s culture and maybe it isn’t’: An ethnographic study of sensemaking, culture and performance in a multicultural team’, Management Learning. doi: 10.1177/13505076211070358.

Jones, O. and Giordano, B. (2021) ‘Family entrepreneurial teams: The role of learning in business model evolution’, Management Learning, 52(3), pp. 267–293. doi: 10.1177/1350507620934092.

Related Episodes from the Talking About Organizations Podcast

Related Resource Pages

References

Jump to: Importance | Foundational Works | Research Areas | Curated List of Articles | TAOP Resources | References