Gender and Feminism (BH.G)

TAOP Resource Center -- Aisle B (Major Theoretical Perspectives) -- Rack BH (Human Dimension)

Resources: Main Page | Research Methods (A) | Major Theories (B) | Issues and Contemporary Topics (C) | Professional Community (D)

Aisle B (Major Theories): Classical Theories (BA) | Org. Behavior – Individual (BB1) | Org. Behavior – Groups & Teams (BB2) | Org. Behavior – Systems & Culture (BB3) | Contingency Theories (BC) | Org. Design (BD) | Org. Development & Change (BG) | Human Relations Theories (BH) | Institution Theories (BI) | Leadership Theories (BL) | Modern Management Perspectives (BM) | Postmodern & Critical Theories (BQ) | Sociology & Anthropology (BS)

Rack BH (Human Dimension): Care & Care Ethics (BH.C) | Gender and Feminism (BH.G) | Human Relations School | Org. Culture | Org. Climate | Org. Identity

Jump to: Importance | Foundational Works | Research Areas | Curated List of Articles | TAOP Resources | References

Gender has been a significant topic in organization studies for a long time. We featured the groundbreaking work of Rosabeth Moss Kanter on “tokenism” from 1977 (Episode 17) and covered the third wave of feminism in a review of Joan Acker’s theory of gendering in organizations (Episode 99), but these are only a few of the significant works done in regarding feminist perspectives in organization studies. This page provides a brief overview of the topic and some curated resources for consideration.

Overview of Gender and Feminism in Organization Studies

A simple way to appreciate the roles that scholars of gender and feminism have played in organization studies is to connect them with the various waves of feminist thought since the late 19th century.

First Wave (Late 19th – Early 20th Century). In addition to contributing to discourse on voting and other basic rights, the first wave of feminism laid the groundwork for examining women’s participation in the workplace. While not directly engaging with organizational theory, its emphasis on legal rights and equal access influenced early research on women’s employment barriers and workplace discrimination. The push for suffrage and basic worker rights prompted initial examinations of how organizations systematically excluded women from certain roles and positions.

Classic works of organization studies (for example, the Hawthorne Studies) assumed traditional gender roles as part of the natural work environment and did not subject those roles to scrutiny. Moreover, because men and women generally performed different tasks and gender integration was very limited, studies including both men and women participants were more likely to be conducted in multiple sites such as an all-male department and an all-female department (see Episode 119 for an example).

Second Wave (1960s-1980s). The second wave of feminism represented the first to challenge traditional gender roles and seek to understand the ways that women were systematically disadvantaged in the workplace. Key works included those of Cook, et al. (1975) who studied working mothers in eleven different countries, Rosabeth Moss Kanter’s famous study (1977) on tokenism that we covered (Episode 17), and Claudia Epstein’s 1970 book Woman’s place that described how professional women across numerous vocations were systematically marginalized. Joan Acker (better known in the third wave, discussed below) began her writings in the 1970s on institutional stratification. Other emerging topics of research included challenging the perceived neutrality of bureaucracies (Ferguson, 1984) and exposing the problems of sexual harassment in the workplace (Farley, 1975).

However, the standing presumption remained that organizations were basically gender neutral. In other words, the problems were caused more by nefarious decisions by individuals. This view, however, was diminishing.

Third Wave (1990s-2000s). Enter the third wave, where scholars began viewing organizations as inherently gendered. The aforementioned Joan Acker was already forming this view, but her more famous works on the matter were published in the 1990s (see Episode 99). In addition, the third wave introduced intersectional analysis examining how gender interacts with race, class, and other identities in organizational contexts to doubly-marginalize certain individuals, and also introduced more fluid and non-binary conceptions of gender in organizational studies.

The key theme separating the second and third waves was the move away from altering the workplace and accommodating more gender diversity toward demanding reform.

Fourth Wave (2010s-Present). The fourth wave (caveat below) of feminism continues to influence organizational studies to this day, with heavier focus on how digitization has enabled workplace activism for feminist causes but also the presence of new forms of harassment and discrimination. Research has explored how technology has furthered gendering of the workplace rather than help eliminate it, illuminated the experiences of non-binary and transgender persons, and emphasized intersectional approaches to leadership.

Now, the caveat — not all scholars agree that there is a fourth wave (Nicholson, 2010). Some see the “fourth wave” as just an extension of the third, just with new technologies. Others have come to believe the “wave” metaphor as itself problematic because it obscures the complexity of the issues raised behind structured time divisions that may not be meaningful. Regardless, the evolution of scholarship to allow for more nuanced or complex realities, present more comprehensive and sophisticated theories, and broadening to more globally diverse settings than just the west alone.


Some Foundational Works on Gender and Feminism in Organization Studies

The above provides a sense of history connecting gender and feminist thought in organizational contexts over time, but other works would be considered foundational for the scholarship of gender and feminism.

Kessler & McKenna, Gender: An Ethnomethodological Approach. This 1978 book critically interrogates the relationship between sex and gender, challenging the biological determinism that underpinned much of the earlier scholarship and arguing that gender is a social construct. This has had profound implications for understanding organizational dynamics and the roles individuals play within them (Gerson, 2005). The authors’ ethnomethodological perspective emphasizes how everyday interactions contribute to the maintenance of gender norms.

Calás & Smircich, From the ‘Woman’s Point of View. This is a book chapter from 1999 that appeared in the book Studying organization: Theory & method edited by Clegg & Hardy. The authors critique traditional organizational theories that often overlook women’s experiences and perspectives, and thus advocate for a feminist approach to organization studies that incorporates women’s voices.

Hearn & Parkin, Gender and Organizations: A Selective Review and a Critique of a Neglected Area. This is a 1983 article that provided a comprehensive overview of the literature on gender in organizations up to that point. They highlighted the marginalization of gender issues within organization studies and call for a more integrated approach that considers the implications of gender for organizational theory and practice. Their critique has spurred further research and discussion about the importance of gender as a category of analysis in organizational contexts.

Acker, Hierarchies, jobs, bodies: A theory of gendered organizations. Joan Acker’s (1990) concept of “gendered organizations” has been foundational in understanding how organizational structures and practices perpetuate gender inequalities. Her work emphasizes the need to analyze organizations through a gender lens, revealing how gender is embedded in organizational processes and cultures.


Contemporary Areas of Research

Contemporary research into gender and feminism within organization studies encompasses a diverse array of themes, reflecting the multifaceted nature of gender dynamics in the workplace. Naturally, research in areas mentioned above have been furthered (ostensibly under the “fourth wave”), such as studies that look at how newer organizational forms such as worker cooperatives, are reproducing gender disparities even in collectivist settings (Sobering et al., 2014; Sobering, 2016).

Intersection of feminism with political ideologies. Feminist movements can come in different forms. One study illustrates how women within far-right movements navigate and reshape feminist discourses to align with their political agendas, thereby complicating traditional feminist narratives (Kamenou, 2023). Such intersectionality in different political contexts can influence women’s agency and the broader feminist movement, suggesting that feminism is not a monolithic entity but rather a contested space shaped by various socio-political factors.

Postfeminism. The perceived declines in feminist thought or support for feminist causes in some contexts is being studied as postfeminism. One study discusses how postfeminist sensibilities emphasize individualism and personal choice, often at the expense of structural analyses of inequality (Gill et al., 2016). Another study examines the emergence of stigma associated with feminist identities in various industries, such as the video game sector where feminist ideas are often marginalized or co-opted (Kivijärvi & Sintonen, 2021).

Transnational and global feminisms. Researchers are showing interest in cross-border collaborations among women’s movements. Questions include to what extent do the interconnectedness of gender issues globally foster feminist activism to address both local and global contexts (Desai, 2023). Additionally, the exploration of gender roles within specific cultural contexts, such as the experiences of Indigenous women or the implications of generational shifts in attitudes towards feminism, provides insights into the diverse manifestations of gender and feminism in organizational settings (Karim, 2024; Mori, 2023). These studies contribute to our understanding of cultural, socio-economic, and historical factors shaping women’s experiences and their engagements with feminist ideologies.


Curated List of Articles from the Management Learning Journal

This is a curated list of resources originated provided by the Management Learning Journal for the TAOP website. Many thanks to Jarryd Daymond and Cara Reed for assembling this.

Gray, D. E., & Goregaokar, H. (2010). Choosing an executive coach: The influence of gender on the coach-coachee matching process. Management Learning, 41(5), 525-544.

Coaching has enjoyed substantial commercial growth, but empirical support for its effectiveness is limited. Nowhere is this more so than in the matching process between coach and coachee. This study describes the results from a coaching programme in which coachees were asked to reflect on and justify their choice of coach. Initial, qualitative results suggested that female coachees favoured the choice of female coaches, partly as a role model of business success. Male coachees tended to justify the selection of a female coach as more approachable for the discussion of sensitive, personal issues. A minority of male respondents also displayed sexist attitudes in their comments on the selection process. Subsequent quantitative analysis of the data, however, revealed no bias towards the choice of either female or male coaches. While the results show no statistical significance in gender choices, for a minority of coachees, gender is a rather surprising factor in the selection process.

Kelan, E. K. (2013). The becoming of business bodies: Gender, appearance, and leadership development. Management Learning, 44(1), 45-61. 

The article uses media images of businesswomen to explore how Master of Business Administration students position themselves in relation to the businesswomen. Following feminist media studies, the article argues that subjects are “becoming” through media images. In order to explore subject formation processes through images, a business school setting, as a place that develops future leaders and that is dominated by men and masculinity, was chosen. The analysis of the interviews indicates that Master of Business Administration students position themselves in relation to the images of businesswomen by commenting on the appropriateness of dress based on the industry and by discussing that being sexually attractive is deemed unprofessional for women. While the subject positions that the Master of Business Administration students occupied were rather normative in nature, the article argues that images can be used as a helpful tool to allow reflection on normativity in relation to gender in leadership development. It is thereby possible to think about a displacement of norms by facilitating the use of alternative subject positions.

Stead, V. (2013). Learning to deploy (in) visibility: An examination of women leaders’ lived experiences. Management Learning, 44(1), 63-79. 

This article focuses on women’s learning from their lived experiences of leadership. In an examination of how six women leaders at a UK University learn to deploy (in)visibility, I draw on conceptualisations of (in)visibility more commonly found in feminist research. These include surface ideas of (in)visibility as states of exclusion or difference due to a lack of women in leadership roles, and deeper ideas of how states of visibility and invisibility are maintained through power relations. I also refer to ideas on how (in)visibility operates and is produced and reproduced through organisational processes and practices. This analysis extends critical perspectives of leadership learning and development. Specifically, it adds to understandings of the tacit nature of social and situated learning through an articulation of the ways in which gender and power operate in women’s learning of leadership from experiences of (in)visibility. This article concludes by indicating further areas for research, including more developed understandings of women’s learning to think strategically from experience, examining the role of management educators in revealing women’s leadership learning and identifying methodologies to examine women leaders’ learning experiences.

Panayiotou, A. (2015). Spacing gender, gendering space: A radical “strong plot” in film. Management Learning, 46(4), 427-443. 

This article seeks to contribute to the discussion on organizational space and gender by focusing on a powerful tool for management learning—popular culture and, in particular, Hollywood films. Taking a performative practice approach to the study of both gender and space and working with films featuring women in the central organizational role, this study explores the protagonists’ spatial practices as these are used to subvert, intentionally or unintentionally, organizational patriarchal structures. In this context, the study traces both how space is gendered through particular situated social practices and how gender is spaced, or how gender performativity is materialized in and through organizational space. Findings show that although on surface organizational spaces marginalize women, certain spatial practices can hybridize the workspace and transform the “margin” into a “space of radical openness.” This new space can also aid in subverting the traditional “strong plot” of the career woman, thus transforming both what we know and how we know in organizations.

Mughal, F., Gatrell, C., & Stead, V. (2018). Cultural politics and the role of the action learning facilitator: Analysing the negotiation of critical action learning in the Pakistani MBA through a Bourdieusian lens. Management Learning, 49(1), 69-85. 

This empirical study contributes to critical action learning research by theorizing the role of an action learning facilitator from a cultural perspective. Our article adds to critical action learning by conceptualizing the dynamics of facilitation in managing interpersonal politics within action learning sets. Employing Bourdieu’s notion of habitus as a theoretical lens, we explore both participant and facilitator accounts of action learning at three Pakistani business schools, shedding light on the culturally influenced social practices that shape their learning interactions. Through a critical interpretation of our data, we illuminate the challenges of facilitation by revealing how deeply ingrained power relations, within the context of gender and asymmetric relationships, influence participants’ ability to organize reflection. We contribute to critical action learning by theorizing the critical role of facilitator mediation in managing interpersonal and intra-group relations within the Pakistani MBA context, outlining the implications for the dynamics and facilitation of action learning.

Stead, V., & Elliott, C. (2019). Pedagogies of power: Media artefacts as public pedagogy for women’s leadership development. Management Learning, 50(2), 171-188. 

This article extends the idea of media artefacts as educational resources by examining web-based materials, specifically women’s ‘Power Lists’, to deepen understandings regarding media artefacts’ role in informing women’s leadership learning and development. Women’s underrepresentation in senior leadership roles places leadership development under scrutiny to develop theoretically informed frameworks that draw attention to gendered power relations in organisations. This article addresses this concern by drawing on cultural theory to theorise media artefacts as forms of public pedagogy. The pedagogic framework proposed presents a distinctive addition to leadership education methods that attend to the sociocultural and recognise the significance of informal learning to leadership learning. Recognising media artefacts’ pedagogic role enables individuals to examine in more detail the gendered nature of the social values and norms that inform leadership discourse, and how these values and norms are promoted, reproduced and sustained through media artefacts.

Blithe, S. J. (2019) “I Always Knew I was a Little Girly”: The gendering of skills in management training. Management Learning, 50(5), 517-533. 

This article examines the ways in which popular management texts organize individual behavior in gendered ways at work. Taking the ‘Strengths’ program as an example of a popular management text that shapes action, the study finds that even though the text itself makes no explicit reference to gender, it (re)produces and encourages gendered behavior and perpetuates stereotypes about gender and skill. Based on textual analysis, auto-ethnographic accounts, and critical reflection of strengths-based corporate training sessions, the study concludes with a discussion about the ways that organizational texts are consumed through a gendered lens.

Mavin, S., & Yusupova, M. (2021). Competition and gender: Time’s up on essentialist knowledge production. Management Learning, 52(1), 86-108.

This article is an intervention in current trends of thinking about competition and gender in essentialist and stereotypical ways. Such thinking has produced numerous comparative studies measuring competitiveness of women and men; ‘proving’ men as competitive and women as non-competitive. Based on experiments and written questionnaires, these studies reduce gender to perceived biological sex and treat competition as a ‘self-evident’, static and easily measurable phenomenon. To contribute new understandings and learning, we surface five fallacies of this comparative research, explaining why the approach is misleading, inequitable and socially harmful. Drawing upon gender as a social construction and women leaders’ narratives, we offer a blueprint for democratising knowledge production. We write differently, choosing not to provide a ‘balanced’ view of the field and construct competition as a processual, complex and contextually specific phenomenon with underlying gender dynamics, rather than a discrete, observable and fixed in time event. The article provides learning: for leaders and managers to resist automatic categorisation on the basis of perceived biological sex; for management educators to challenge the ways that leadership and management are traditionally taught; and, for executive coaches to support changes in practice, by embracing complexity of the contemporary contexts in which leaders operate.


Related Episodes from the Talking About Organizations Podcast

119: Management & the Worker — Roethlisberger & Dickson

We return for another look at the Hawthorne Studies through Fritz Roethlisberger and William Dickson’s 1939 book Management and the Worker. The work chronicles five years of experiments that initially sought the optimal conditions for increased worker performance but evolved into an examination of the social controls that worker exercise over themselves for self-preservation against managerial decisions. It also includes an introspective look into the researchers themselves as they had to design new experiments to make sense of the surprising and contradictory findings. The book is incredibly detailed and laid the foundation for the development of the Human Relations tradition …

112: Hierarchies & Promotion – The “Peter Principle”

The diligent administrative assistant moves up to supervisor but fails. The assembly line worker is promoted to foreman but cannot do the job. A teacher earns a deputy principal position in a school but falls flat on their face. Why is that? Why does this seem to happen across organizations? In The Peter Principle, Lawrence J. Peter and Raymond Hull not only provides answers to these questions, they delve into all the possible implications. The Principle goes like this, “In a hierarchy, everyone rises to their level of incompetence.” How they derived this principle the subject of our conversation that …

108: Presentation of Self in Everyday Life – Goffman

Erving Goffman’s 1959 book The Presentation of Self in Everyday Life was an important attempt at explaining both apparent and hidden human behaviors across social and organizational settings. Through a comprehensive framework employing theater as a metaphor, he describes the roles of people as performers and members of an audience who try to shape the unfolding situation in ways suitable to their aims. Meanwhile, there is a backstage where people return to being themselves and proceed to set conditions for the next performance, and rules and protocols seek to protect such backstage behaviors from unwanted observation or disclosure. The aim …

105: Manifest & Latent Roles — Alvin Gouldner

Alvin Gouldner wrote the article, “Cosmopolitans and locals: Toward an analysis of latent social roles” in 1957 to propose that through the 1950s latent roles had been seriously overlooked by scholars. Manifest roles, described as those roles and role identities that are directly related to one’s defined position in the organizational structure, had been the sole focus. Latent roles comprised the complementary roles that members made salient but were not officially recognized. Instead, managers might dismiss such roles as “irrelevant, inappropriate, or illegitimate” to recognize formally despite them being essential in the organization’s social fabric …

101: The Motivation to Work — Frederick Herzberg

Frederick Herzberg’s “The Motivation to Work” presents the results of over 200 interviews with engineers and accountants working in the Pittsburgh area regarding what satisfied and dissatisfied them on the job. They would find that factors leading to satisfaction, such as achievement and performance, were very different than those leading to dissatisfaction, such as company policies or relationships with co-workers and managers. The result became known as Herzberg’s Two-Factor Theory of Job Satisfaction, also known as the motivator-hygiene theory …

99: Gendering in Organizations — Joan Acker

Joan Acker’s 1990 article “Hierarchies, Jobs, Bodies: A Theory of Gendered Organizations” was a significant work in feminist theories of organizations. She charged that prior feminist research had wrongly assumed that organizational structures were gender neutral. Instead, everything about organizations from structures to symbols are inherently gendered, and until that was acknowledged and studied, organizations would continue to reinforce long-standing gender inequalities. The article is significant for its synthesis of a growing body of research that questioned the claims of gender neutrality in organizational practices that creates and sustains barriers to women’s equality in the workplace …

94: Situated Learning – Lave & Wenger

This month, we discuss Jean Lave & Etienne Wenger’s Situated Learning: Legitimate Peripheral Participation, published in 1991. This short but powerful book presents a new way of thinking about adult learning as a social activity in which experienced members of a group or community of practice share their knowledge with new members to perpetuate the group identity. They present five case studies – one by Lave herself with four from other researchers – to help broaden the perspective of how situated learning works social involvement in which newer members are initiated through the exercise of low-risk or controlled tasks …

88: Social Defenses Against Anxiety — Isabel Menzies

This month’s episode examines one of the classic studies from the Tavistock Institute, Isabel Menzies’ “A Case-Study in the Functioning of Social Systems as a Defence Against Anxiety.” This famous study of how a teaching hospital developed odd and somewhat dysfunctional methods for protecting its nurses from anxiety and stress by effectively isolating nurses from the patients to prevent emotional attachment. Nursing students witnessing these methods in practice found them in violation of their expectations regarding care and their professional calling, and were quitting. What were these methods and why did they come about? …

78: Patterns of Bureaucracy — Alvin Gouldner

We discuss a classic 1954 book by Alvin Gouldner titled, Patterns of Industrial Bureaucracy. This describes the results of an ethnographic study conducted at a gypsum processing plant that included both a mine and a production line for construction materials. Gouldner and his team uncovered three distinct patterns of bureaucratic rules based on the acceptance and compliance of bureaucratic rules by workers and management – patterns still relevant today …

71: Managerial Behavior — Melville Dalton

2020 ushered in a full year of major change and renewed a lot of conversations about how we work, live, and cooperate in organizations and societies. In that spirit, we discuss Melville Dalton’s classic 1959 book “Men Who Manage: Fusions of Feeling and Theory in Administration.” The study provided an intimate look at how men (as these were all men at the time) entered into the managerial culture of a firm, how the separations between managers are workers were structured and maintained, and how managers felt about their standing — which ranged from secure to tenuous. In Part 1, we …

66: Workplace Isolation – Forester

In this episode (which took place in the early days of the COVID-19 pandemic), we explore the social and emotional impacts to the worker on having to work from home. For some workers, the concept of telework is hardly new. But many other vocations place great value on regular social contact with clients and customers. These include teachers, doctors, lawyers, public servants, and many others. The sudden thrust to teleworking for an unknown period of time has raised questions as to how these workers are coping with the new normal …

59: Theory X and Y – Douglas McGregor

In this episode, we examine Douglas McGregor’s most famous work, The Human Side of Enterprise, that proposed two “theories” encapsulating management assumptions about human behavior. His Theory X described the dominant thinking of the 1950s, where managers held a dim view of employees, who were assumed to be disinclined to work and had to be coerced into doing so. McGregor felt that Theory X led to adversarial relationships between managers and workers, resulting in poorer performance and an unhealthy environment. His Theory Y saw employees as wishing to be challenged and fulfilled if properly empowered and engaged …

54: Measuring Organizational Cultures – Hofstede

We cover Hofstede’s classic 1990 paper, “Measuring Organizational Cultures: A Qualitative and Quantitative Study Across Twenty Cases.” Through surveys and interviews among members of twenty units within ten large organizations, Geert Hofstede’s team proposed six distinct determinants of organizational culture that could be compared and contrasted across all organizations …

53: Taylorism in Motion — Charlie Chaplin’s Modern Times

We discuss Charlie Chaplin’s 1936 film “Modern Times” balances great physical comedy with powerful social commentary. Chaplin portrayed a hapless Worker on an assembly line who is tormented both by supervisors and the work itself. After being subjected to a humiliating experiment intended to improve the line’s efficiency, the Worker runs through a series of rotating jobs, stints in jail, and other misadventures as he tries to find his purpose in life …

49: Engineered Culture and Normative Control – Gideon Kunda

Originally published in 1992, Gideon Kunda’s ethnographic study of a high-tech corporation altered the discourse on organizational culture. “Tech,” the firm being studied, was a firm on the rise and saw itself as a leader and ground breaker in the rapidly growing high-tech industries of the 1980s. But as the firm grew, it began indoctrinating its tried-and-true hard-work formula in aggressive and unhelpful ways …

47: Organizational Identity — Albert & Whetten

“Who are WE?” The pursuit of an answer to this tantalizingly simple question began with a book chapter written in 1985 by organization theorists Stuart Albert and David Whetten. “Organizational Identity” established the construct of identity at the organizational level and described it as the sum of three types of claims — claims of an organization’s central character, claims of its distinctiveness from other organizations, and claims of temporal continuity that tie the present organization to its history …

45: Fate of Whistleblowers – C. Fred Alford

We discuss Fred Alford’s book Whistleblowers: Broken Lives and Organizational Power in 2001 to understand and make sense of horrible treatment often suffered by those who witness and report illegal or immoral acts and have the courage and persistence to speak up and stand for what is right. In workplace environments, we have a name for such heroic men and women – whistleblowers. But historically, the experiences of many other whistleblowers are discouraging – being ostracized, ignored, harassed, marginalized, physically attacked, socially isolated and ultimately defeated while the wrongdoers continue with their organizations. Alford’s study brings these experiences to light …

Milton Hershey and an Organization’s Commitment to its Members

As a contrast to the gig economy discussions of recent episodes, Tom offers an example of an organization and its leader who exercised high organizational commitment to its members. This is the story of Milton Hershey, the founder of both the Hershey Chocolate Factory and the small town that grew from it, then located in a rather remote spot east of Harrisburg, Pennsylvania …

38: Socialization and Occupational Communities – Van Maanen

In this episode, we examine John Van Maanen’s classic ethnographic study of police recruits from an urban police department in the U.S. “Police socialization: A longitudinal examination of job attitudes in an urban police department,” published in Administrative Science Quarterly in 1975, presents Van Maanen’s study on the socialization process of new police officers from their training and indoctrination at the police academy to their early months on the beat …

35: The Managed Heart – Arlie Hochschild

The Managed Heart, originally published in 1983 by Dr. Arlie Hochschild, introduced the concept of emotional labour as a counterpart to the physical and mental labour performed in the scope of one’s duties. The importance of emotional labour is made clear in Dr. Hochschild’s descrption of flight attendants, who regardless of the dispositions of airline passengers, turbulence in the flight, or personal stress is required to act and behave in ways that minimize passenger anxiety and encourage them to fly with that airline again. Thus, the book explores the challenges of stress, protecting one’s personal identity and private life, differentiated …

34: Sociotechnical Systems – Trist and Bamforth

We discuss important article by Eric Trist and Ken Bamforth, “Some Social and Psychological Consequences of the Longwall Method of Coal-Getting,” published in the journal Human Relations in 1951. Eric Trist was a British social scientist best known for his contributions to the field of organization development and one of the founders of the Tavistock Institute. Ken Bamforth was a miner and industrial fellow of the Tavistock Institute. The article’s subtitle is an examination of the psychological situation and defences of a work group in relation to the social structure and technological content of the work system, and explores how …

Reflections on Wieliczka

Tom reflects on an experience that arose during his preparations for Episode 34 (Trist & Bamforth, 1951). In this post, he reminisces on a bus tour taken in the summer of 2001 from Heidelberg, Germany to the Wieliczka Salt Mines located only a short drive from Krakow. These mines are famous for the salt sculptures and engravings that the miners carved out of the walls as a means of overcoming the harsh and isolated environment …

33: Foreman – Master and Victim of Doubletalk

This episode covered Fritz J. Roethlisberger’s classic 1945 article from Harvard Business Review (HBR), “The FOREMAN: Master and Victim of Double Talk.” The article resulted from a study concerning the dissatisfaction of foremen in mass production industries at the time. Foremen suffered under low pay and poor wartime working conditions. Meanwhile, management addressed the foremen’s concerns through short-sighted “symptom-by-symptom” corrective actions to little effect. As a result, foremen were leaning toward unionization, while management found itself unable to keep pace with the social implications of rapidly advancing technologies on the supervisory structure …

32: Organizational Stupidity with Mats Alvesson and Bjorn Erik Mork LIVE

“Functional stupidity” is the term used by Alvesson and Spicer to describe a strange phenomenon they observed in practice: smart people in organizations that do seemingly not smart things because people are discouraged to think and reflect. Mats Alvesson and Bjørn Erik Mørk sit down with Ralph to talk about functional stupidity and real world implications for nearly an hour after Mats’ keynote speech at the conference …

Related Resource Pages

Rack BA — Classic Organization and Management Theory

Curated list of resources regarding the major “classical” theories that initiated the field of organization studies, beginning with Taylorism and scientific management and continuing with the theories Fayol, Weber, and others …

Rack BB1 – Organizational Behavior (Micro-Individual)

Curated list of resources regarding the major theories of organization behavior such as emotions, sensemaking, socialization and organizational climate, and many others …

Rack BB2 — Organizational Behavior (Meso-Groups and Teams)

Curated list of resources regarding theories on groups, teams, and other small collections of individuals within an organizational context, from the worker level to top management teams …

Rack BB3 — Organizational Behavior (Macro-Org/System)

Curated list of resources on open systems theory and its many descendents such as general systems theory, cybernetics, and organizational ecology …

Rack BC — Contingency Theory

Curated list of resources regarding the major theories regarding the organizational context and how particular situations influence organizational structures, behaviors, and so on. Includes classic contingency theories and pragmatism …

Rack BD — Organizational Design

Curated list of resources on theories related to organizational structures and design, including control structures, power, and job design …

Rack BG — Organizational Development and Change

Curated list of resources regarding various theories regarding the external environment in organizations, such as labor relations, resource dependence theory, and others …

Rack BH – Human Dimension – Culture, Climate, Identity

Curated list of resources regarding sustainability and corporate social responsibility such as sustainable business practices, responses to climate change, sociomateriality, and ethical considerations …

Rack BI — Institution Theory

Curated list of resources on institution theory as exercised in organization studies …

Rack BL — Leadership Theories

Curated list of resources on theories related to leadership in organizations including classic trait theory, behavioral theories of leadership, and transactional / transformational leadership …

Rack BM – Modern Management Theories

Curated list of resources regarding the major schools of thought and the theoretical perspectives they established. Includes the Carnegie-Mellon School, Aston School, and others …

Rack BQ — Postmodern and Critical Theories

Curated list of resources on postmodernist views of organizations and organizing and contrasting them with the modernist view. Includes critical management studies and complexity theory …

Rack BS — Sociology & Anthropology

Curated list of resources on postmodernist views of organizations and organizing and contrasting them with the modernist view. Includes critical management studies and complexity theory …

References

Acker, J. (1990). Hierarchies, jobs, bodies: A theory of gendered organizations. Gender & society, 4(2), 139-158.

Anthropic. (2024). What is the relationship between feminism studies and organization studies; How have the different waves of feminism impacted organization studies; What are the most important foundational works on gender and feminism from before 1980 in organization studies; What about studies of sexual harassment before 1980; Do some scholars reject the notion of a fourth wave of feminism; Please explain which scholars. Claude (March 2024 version) [Large Language Model].

Blithe, S. J. (2019) “I Always Knew I was a Little Girly”: The gendering of skills in management training. Management Learning, 50(5), 517-533. 

Calás, M. B., & Smircich, L. (2006). From the ‘woman’s point of view’ ten years later: Towards a feminist organization studies. The Sage handbook of organization studies, 284-347.

Clegg, S. R., Clegg, S., & Hardy, C. (Eds.). (1999). Studying organization: Theory and method. Sage.

Cook, A. H., Lorwin, V. R., & Daniels, A. K. (1984). Women and trade unions in eleven industrialized countries. Temple University Press.

Desai, M. (2023). Transnational and global feminisms. In The Blackwell Encyclopedia of Sociology. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781405165518.wbeost045.pub2

Epstein, C. F. (1970). Woman’s place: Options and limits in professional careers. University of California Press.

Farley, L. (1975). Sexual shakedown: The sexual harassment of women on the job. McGraw-Hill.

Ferguson, K. E. (1984). The feminist case against bureaucracy: Women in the political economy. Temple University Press.

Gill, R., Kelan, E., & Scharff, C. (2016). A postfeminist sensibility at work. Gender Work and Organization, 24(3), 226-244. https://doi.org/10.1111/gwao.12132

Gray, D. E., & Goregaokar, H. (2010). Choosing an executive coach: The influence of gender on the coach-coachee matching process. Management Learning, 41(5), 525-544.

Hearn, J., & Parkin, P. W. (1983). Gender and organizations: A selective review and a critique of a neglected area. Organization studies, 4(3), 219-242.

Kamenou, N. (2023). Feminism contested and co-opted: women, agency and politics of gender in the Greek and Greek-Cypriot far right. European Journal of Womens Studies, 30(1), 66-83. https://doi.org/10.1177/13505068221145412

Kanter, R. M. (1977). Some effects of proportions on group life: Skewed sex ratios and responses to token women. American journal of Sociology82(5), 965-990.

Karim, R. (2024). Indigenous women perspectives on gender equality and feminism: a case study of jahai women in peninsular malaysia. International Conference on Gender Research, 7(1), 1-9. https://doi.org/10.34190/icgr.7.1.2214

Kelan, E. K. (2013). The becoming of business bodies: Gender, appearance, and leadership development. Management Learning, 44(1), 45-61. 

Kessler, S. J., & McKenna, W. (1985). Gender: An ethnomethodological approach. University of Chicago Press.

Kivijärvi, M. and Sintonen, T. (2021). The stigma of feminism: Disclosures and silences regarding female disadvantage in the video game industry in US and Finnish media stories. Feminist Media Studies, 22(5), 1083-1101. https://doi.org/10.1080/14680777.2021.1878546

Mavin, S., & Yusupova, M. (2021). Competition and gender: Time’s up on essentialist knowledge production. Management Learning, 52(1), 86-108.

Mori, G. (2023). Feminism through the lens of the Gen Z. American Journal of Youth and Women Empowerment, 2(1), 8-16. https://doi.org/10.54536/ajywe.v2i1.1796

Mughal, F., Gatrell, C., & Stead, V. (2018). Cultural politics and the role of the action learning facilitator: Analysing the negotiation of critical action learning in the Pakistani MBA through a Bourdieusian lens. Management Learning, 49(1), 69-85. 

Nicholson, L. (2010). Feminism in ‘waves’: Useful metaphor or not?. New Politics12(4), 34-39.

Panayiotou, A. (2015). Spacing gender, gendering space: A radical “strong plot” in film. Management Learning, 46(4), 427-443. 

Scite. (2024). What are some important contemporary areas of research into gender and feminism in organization studies; What are the most important foundational works on gender and feminism from before 1980 in organization studies. Scite (April 2024 version) [Large Language Model].

Sobering, K. (2016). Producing and reducing gender inequality in a worker-recovered cooperative. Sociological Quarterly, 57(1), 129-151. https://doi.org/10.1111/tsq.12112

Sobering, K., Thomas, J., & Williams, C. (2014). Gender in/equality in worker‐owned businesses. Sociology Compass, 8(11), 1242-1255. https://doi.org/10.1111/soc4.12208

Stead, V. (2013). Learning to deploy (in) visibility: An examination of women leaders’ lived experiences. Management Learning, 44(1), 63-79. 

Stead, V., & Elliott, C. (2019). Pedagogies of power: Media artefacts as public pedagogy for women’s leadership development. Management Learning, 50(2), 171-188.

The inclusion of external links is for informational purposes only and does not necessarily constitute endorsement by TAOP or any of its members.


Jump to: Importance | Foundational Works | Research Areas | Curated List of Articles | TAOP Resources | References

Rack BH (Human Dimension): Care & Care Ethics (BH.C) | Gender and Feminism (BH.G) | Human Relations School | Org. Culture | Org. Climate | Org. Identity

Aisle B (Major Theories): Classical Theories (BA) | Org. Behavior – Individual (BB1) | Org. Behavior – Groups & Teams (BB2) | Org. Behavior – Systems & Culture (BB3) | Contingency Theories (BC) | Org. Design (BD) | Org. Development & Change (BG) | Human Relations Theories (BH) | Institution Theories (BI) | Leadership Theories (BL) | Modern Management Perspectives (BM) | Postmodern & Critical Theories (BQ) | Sociology & Anthropology (BS)

Resources: Main Page | Research Methods (A) | Major Theories (B) | Issues and Contemporary Topics (C) | Professional Community (D)